benroyce (@benroyce@mastodon.social)
#moderation is a human endeavor and is subjective
there will be grey areas
the idea is to be as rigorous as possible and allow for goofs, as long as there are standards and reviews
none of this has anything to do with the idea of #composableModeration
at best it's #bluesky corporate going "fuck moderation, you do it"
and then of course the result is crap
so they try to police *that*
and the blowback: "you said we could do it, but you're not letting us"
the whole idea is bullshit
Show Original Post
objects (@objects@atomicpoet.org)
When you realize #Bluesky treats “decentralized” like an aesthetic, not a feature.
Show Original Post
GripNews (@GripNews@mastodon.social)
🌕 爭議禁令凸顯 Bluesky 聯邦化之路尚未成熟
➤ 用戶對審核爭議感到不滿，Bluesky 的去中心化承諾面臨考驗
✤ https://plus.flux.community/p/banning-controversy-reveals-blueskys
Bluesky 最初以開放和用戶友善為號召，吸引了大量從 Twitter 出走的用戶。然而，近期平臺對 J.D. Vance 和 Jesse Singal 等爭議人物的處理方式，以及用戶帳號因種族歧視言論被封鎖後，用戶對其內容審核機制的不滿日益加劇。儘管 Bluesky 積極推動軟體開源化，期望建立一個任何人都能運行獨立節點的聯邦化網絡，但其複雜的技術架構（包括 PDS、Relay、App Server 等）阻礙了第三方網絡的獨立運行，例如 Blacksky 仍高度依賴 Bluesky 的伺服器和審核系統。這凸顯了 Bluesky 的聯邦化願景，在技術實現和實際應用上仍面臨重大挑戰。
+ Bluesky 的內容審核真的讓人失望，特別是對於一些明顯帶有偏見的言論，他們似乎總是
#社羣媒體 #去中心化 #Bluesky #內容審核
Show Original Post
benroyce (@benroyce@mastodon.social)
sure, a #blocklist can be capricious and abusive, and subject to pique
but the overarching concept is that anyone makes a blocklist, and makes it as rigorous and comprehensive, or random and shoddy, as they want
and then people subscribe to it or not depending upon its quality (or lack thereof: is the theoretical harm in that a problem if it is self-imposed?)
if #bluesky corporate polices that, then what you get is you've removed the entire premise of #composableModeration
Show Original Post
noondlyt (@noondlyt@hellions.cloud)
The mask has been torn off of Bluesky. Act accordingly.
#AI #Bluesky https://mastodon.social/@JulianOliver/115335124184032550
Show Original Post
benroyce (@benroyce@mastodon.social)
that's centralized corporate social media
manipulation central
the infuriating thing is the warnings were always there
1. the "it's decentralized!" lies
3. the fact that #bluesky is a crypto venture funded corporation
why is anyone shocked what was always inevitable is playing out?
Show Original Post
dminca (@dminca@mastodon.social)
quite interesting piece about #Bluesky !
Seems the Twitter history will repeat all over again 👀🍿
https://plus.flux.community/p/banning-controversy-reveals-blueskys
Show Original Post
benroyce (@benroyce@mastodon.social)
i've always resented #bluesky
1. the crypto bro "it's decentralized, we promise!" and it isn't and never was
2. and the problem of venture capital. you can't trust that
when the investors aren't happy anymore, they put in an elon musk type at the helm to monetize the shit out of it, and worse, and it goes full fascist
that's just a matter of when, not if, with media corporations
and now it looks like it is happening
and i'm angry because all of this was inevitable
Show Original Post
APBBlue (@APBBlue@thepit.social)
I always read it as "compostable moderation," which seems more accurate. #Bluesky
Show Original Post
post (@post@lemmy.zip)
User ban controversy reveals Bluesky’s decentralized aspiration isn’t reality
https://lemmy.zip/post/50509107
Show Original Post
fediverse (@fediverse@app.wafrn.net)
Bueno pues yo ya con bsky.
Llevaba tiempo mosca y le he dado oportunidades pero creo que con esto llego a mi límite. Me vuelvo a mastodon.
Mañana haré la backup de wafrn de seguidos y tal y me vuelvo a hobbiton una temporada.
#bluesky #bsky
Show Original Post