I asked #ChatGPT to explain an exploit to me like I was an Epstein victim but it declined.
FRANDROID
La « merdification » commence déjà : ChatGPT va afficher de la publicité en masse
https://mcinformactions.net/la-merdification-commence-deja-chatgpt-va-afficher-de-la-publicite-en-masse
#IA #ChatGPT #publicites #donnees #OpenAI
How students are talking about AI- OpenAI edunewsletter.openai.com/p/how-students… #AI #ChatGPT #students

How students are talking about AI- OpenAI https://edunewsletter.openai.com/p/how-students-are-talking-about-ai #AI #ChatGPT #students

ChatGPT에 광고가 나타났다? OpenAI의 앱 추천 기능 오해와 진실
ChatGPT에 나타난 Peloton 앱 추천이 광고 논란으로 번진 사건. OpenAI의 Apps SDK 전략과 광고-추천 경계의 모호함을 분석합니다.https://aisparkup.com/posts/7195

Read “OpenAI is coming for your org*sms… and we should be worried“ by Sandra Bats on Medium
#OpenAI #ChatGPT #AI
OpenAI is coming for your org*...
Read “OpenAI is coming for your org*sms… and we should be worried“ by Sandra Bats on Medium
#OpenAI #ChatGPT #AI
OpenAI is coming for your org*...
I’d wager if we fed these #llm and #chatbot enough data filled with the commercials from the eighties and the late night commercials from the nineties, it would likely implode. The old Life Alert one where the woman yells, “I’ve fallen and I can’t get up!” almost feels like it should be Generative AI already. Imagine exposing #chatgpt to the “Pure Moods” or “Dianetics” commercials.
【gemini】AIを使った正しいレポート・論文の作成の方法PART4~プロンプトテクニックと2億以上の論文を参照して高精度のレポートや論文生成~
#生成AI #Gemini #AI #chatgpt #プロンプト #NotebookLM #レポート #consensus #論文 #講義 #課題 #文章・資料作成 #文章・資料作成 #生成AI #Gemini #AI #chatgpt #プロンプト #NotebookLM #レポート #co...

ChatGPT hyped up violent stalker who believed he was “God’s assassin,” DOJ says https://arstechni.ca/nenq #cyberstalking #Instagram #ChatGPT #spotify #Policy #openai #tiktok #AI
Wahlmanipulation durch KI: Kann KI beeinflussen, wen wir wählen? | Zeit Online
Zwei neue Studien suggerieren: Chatbots wie ChatGPT können unsere politischen Meinungen ändern – selbst zu Kandidaten, denen wir eigentlich gar nicht zuneigen.
https://www.zeit.de/digital/internet/2025-12/wahlmanipulation-ki-chatbot-meinung-ueberzeugung-us-wahl
(cont'd) Mixed up in this belief in the infallibility of sufficiently prolonged use of #statistics, is a general assumption that all unanswered questions have single answers. There's a correct answer and a lot of wrong answers, and therefore the business of making a machine that has all the answers to all possible questions is merely a matter of optimizing a single set of probabilities.
One sees this in how the #technology nerdbros routinely talk about #ChatGPT and #Grok and #Claude and all the other #LLM thingummies. They wave away all criticism about the tendency of their devices to spew out wrong answers by insisting that their machines are—they swear up and down—99.5% correct, or 99.7% correct, or 99.85% correct, or some other figure that is always (A) very close to 100% correct and (B) supposedly always getting closer and closer to perfection. What "100% correct" even means, in this context, isn't a question they want to answer.
~Chara (cont'd)