cfp (@cfp@social.callingallpapers.com)
24 hours until the CfP for "Monkigras 2026" closes: https://papercall.io/cfps/6454/submissions/new
#cfp #conference #Llm #Prompt engineering #Art and technology #Chatgpt #Generative ai #Google bard #Gemini
Show Original Post
DigitalNaiv (@DigitalNaiv@mastodon.social)
OpenAI bestätigt, dass ChatGPT-Unterhaltungen systematisch gescannt werden – nicht nur gespeichert, sondern aktiv analysiert, intern bewertet und teils an Behörden weitergegeben. Transparenz? Fehlanzeige. Datenschutz? Wunschdenken. Was wir reden, ist nie ganz privat.
Autor: @joergschieb 🆔
Aber wir haben ja alle nichts zu verbergen ...
👉 https://www.schieb.de/openai-ueberwacht-chatgpt-chats-was-bedeutet-das-fuer-euch/
#Datenschutz #AItransparenz #ChatGPT
Show Original Post
altlazybear (@altlazybear@mas.to)
I guess when you configure system prompts, think tags, sampler configs, etc. long enough, the magic behind how and why large language models respond that way fades.
I'm really glad I went to using local LLM first instead of going straight to the llm's big tech comps are paywalling, and that generates tons and tons of paragraphs and stuff very fucking fast there's no way I can read them. I'll admit I haven't even used chatgpt EVER ! Not even while I'm troubleshooting my rig
Show Original Post
ByrdNick (@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de)
If radiologists made more appropriate decisions after input from #chatGPT than before, did #AI *cause* the improvement?
We can't know without a control group of radiologists who made the same decisions at *both* time points *without* input from the #LLM.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2026.01.017
Show Original Post
oduk83 (@oduk83@mastodon.social)
📌 Jasper AI·Copy AI 비교 │ 블로그·마케팅 글 작성 AI 툴
Jasper AI와 Copy AI 중 어떤 툴이 블로그와 마케팅에 더 효율적일까요? 10년 차 블로거가 직접 사용해 본 두 서비스의 특징과 장단점을 완벽 비교해 드립니다. 업무 효율을 10배 높여줄 나에게 꼭 맞는 생성형 AI 글쓰기 도구를 지금 확인해 보세요. ...
Show Original Post
sayzard (@sayzard@mastodon.sayzard.org)
Tibor Blaho (@btibor91)
새로운 ChatGPT Android 앱(v1.2026.055)에 'Naughty chats'라는 설정이 추가됨. 사용자가 요청할 경우 더 선정적이고 성인 테마의 언어 사용을 허용하는 기능으로, 18세 이상 사용자에게만 제공된다고 명시되어 있음. 앱 내 콘텐츠·언어 옵션 관련 변경 사항으로 개발자 및 플랫폼 정책 측면에서 주목할 만함.
https://x.com/btibor91/status/2027171727873314967
#chatgpt #android #app #feature #contentmoderation
Show Original Post
w (@w@peertube.cif.su)
5 ChatGPT Research Hacks That Actually Work (2026)
https://peertube.cif.su/w/4CpJ5HutF9FnzVA9rJXQUY
Show Original Post
altlazybear (@altlazybear@mas.to)
It's only useful if you're interested in a topic you don't know much about but it's where its usefulness ends really, least for me
I'm watching as I write but holy shit I didn't even know chatbot psychosis is a thing and actually got a dedicated wikipedia page for it.
Well, I'm pretty confident I've gotten immune to it, given I've been talking to llm's and have built some kind of "isolated system" in my brain when talking to llm's. It's like a virtual machine thingamajig.
Show Original Post
2026 (@2026@elizabethtai.com)
The Writing Community’s AI Panic
Another day, another storm in the writing community teacup!
The storm, this New York Times article: The New Fabio is Claude
TL;DR: Coral Hart uses AI to generate 200 books a year. This has made many writers mad, mad, mad.
(Somewhere in a glistening office tower is a very satisfied editor – the ragebait has worked as the article is widely discussed everywhere. KPI met!)
Coral Hart is just the newest “outrage” in a long list of “outrages” for writers.
If you’re as much of a social media hermit as I am, you’re probably unaware that the fiction writing community is currently being torn apart by those who use AI to write and those who aren’t.
I won’t go deep into the arguments for or against writers like Coral Hart right now, as this article is more about the writing community than AI and the answers are just a Google away.
Also, when I’m talking about the writing community, I’m talking about the online writing community that writes in English. They often come from countries such as the United States, Europe, and to a degree, Australia and New Zealand.
I personally do not know how the Malaysian fiction writing community is reacting to AI as I have limited contact with the community at large. (That’s another long story.)
How I reacted when AI became a thing
Like most writers, I was also resentful and upset, especially about the idea that our writing has been used to train AI without our permission.
But I’m a realist because I work in tech, and I have a realistic view of the technology. I have used AI for quite some time, even before ChatGPT became a thing.
Over time, my perspective changed as I found out how the technology worked, and calmed down. I am even experimenting with using AI to assist me when I write fiction.
Here’s the harsh truth: Either a writer is willing to adapt or they are not. Those who refuse will end up being behind, as they won’t be able to reap the benefits that AI gives a writer.
When you’re a working writer, you gotta face industry realities
On a practical level, at work, AI has been invaluable in helping me learn concepts faster. I’ve also created agents and accelerated my writing workflows because of it.
A powerful AI search bot on a knowledge base with rich data has been game-changing for me as well. (No more begging for stuff from colleagues and waiting for days to receive them!)
Elizabeth TaifirediaristEdit Profile
AI is also discussed in societies differently. In the West, doomerism prevails. In the East, especially China, there’s lots of optimism and it is now actively used in smart factories and hospitals. There are different types of AI, and LLMs are just one of them, so for the purpose of this article I’ll be focusing on LLMs.
These regional cultural attitudes will affect how AI is received in writing communities.
At the end of the day, AI is just technology—neither inherently good nor bad.
Writing communities have always been prone to toxicity; AI is just the newest trigger
The online writing community on a good day.To be honest, the fiction writing community has always been toxic to me. Even in Malaysia.
They’re always squabbling and attacking each other for one reason or another. During the early days of indie publishing, traditionally published authors sniffed at indie published authors, saying they’re not real writers. Now, it’s writers who are using AI assistance that are “not real writers”.
I’m not sure what it is about the writing craft and why its communities are like that. I have a theory that this is because writing, as a craft, is so closely tied to one’s ego. So, anything that threatens that makes people go crazy.
I’m a working writer (like, I literally write for media and corporations). I have been writing professionally for decades. Not only has my ego been pulverised by sharp-tongued editors and scathing reviews, I have no time for this shit. I need food on the table, so I need to write, end of story.
I prefer to use my limited free time to practice my craft – write fiction free of the demands of a cash till or boss. I don’t have time to reply or write posts in forums or social media defending my ego or hoping to get some understanding from a community that is often fighting among themselves.
During the early days of indie publishing, traditionally published authors sniffed at indie published authors, saying they’re not real writers. Now, it’s writers who are using AI assistance that are “not real writers”.
One thing I noticed lately, especially on Substack, is that many anti-AI writers have ended up bullying writers who do.
Frankly, I have no idea why people do this. What will that accomplish? How will that improve anything? Their anger should be directed at the tech giants who impose technology without understanding its impact on creatives, or at governments that refuse to regulate.
Honestly, it is not worth arguing with these bullies because they are too fearful of a technology they do not understand. The right thing to do is to block them because your energy is precious—you need to use it to create, not engage with people who refuse to do their own research and dare to experiment with this technology to truly understand what it means.
Unless these bullies who come hurling nasty words at you truly understand what AI does, they shouldn’t bully others about it. They only reveal their own lack of knowledge and understanding.
If a writer is hungering for community, especially one that uses AI to support their work, the best thing is to get it from small pockets of like-minded writers. Big is not always better.
The disability perspective
Another common narrative is that AI isn’t solving real problems but creating problems to solve.
For one, and I will continue being annoying about this, I have seen how it helps neurodivergent communities or those with cognitive problems, even in the creative field. Their struggles are valid, even if they aren’t always visible. Let’s not dismiss their problems so quickly just because their issues seem incomprehensible or not real to neurotypicals.
Ethical AI use?
As for writers who use AI, they must decide for themselves how they want to use it.
Sadly, due to the hostility against AI in the fiction writing community, I’ve come to believe it’s not worth announcing that you use AI.
One, writers don’t need validation for the tools we choose.
Two, I find these arguments around AI a bit silly. We’ve been using AI long before LLMs became a thing. People argued that spell checkers weren’t AI, but modern versions definitely are. AI has done a lot for knowledge management, a field I work in and love. It makes knowledge sharing easier and information more accessible.
What we need to discuss
What we really need to discuss are the rampant capitalistic forces that are driving this hype and the safeguards that are sorely needed to protect jobs, creative works, and societal stability.
We need to discuss the production-driven, “we need to write more books faster” culture that is now festering in indie publishing.
We need to come up with a better way to matchmake books and authors with their destined readers.
But no, writers are fighting with each other.
And the powers that be continue with a grin, knowing that their profits are still coming in because the writing community is as divided as ever.
I just know there would be a writer or two who would probably come at me and yell that I’m supporting Coral Hart or all for generating novels with AI due to my Guide to writing fiction with AI, all because I have written such a guide and I’m not raising my pitchfork at Coral.
Which, of course, makes me question the reading comprehension abilities of writers who claim to write professionally, sometimes. I will address my reaction to Coral’s situation, and what I think about generating 200 novels a year in my next post, promise.
#AIwriting #AIfictionwriting #BeingAWriter #ChatGPT #FictionWritingWithAI #writing
Show Original Post
r (@r@fed.brid.gy)
Satisfaction du jour : se faire féliciter par Claude et ChatGPT pour avoir trouvé une meilleure solution (+simple, +fiable et bien +rapide) que celles qu'ils m'avaient proposées. Claude : +1 car il m'a demandé la solution utilisée pour aider d'autres personnes à l'avenir #ia #coding #chatGPT #claude
Show Original Post
WinFuture (@WinFuture@mastodon.social)
#ChatGPT Health versagt bei der Notfallerkennung: Eine Studie zeigt, dass die #KI über die Hälfte aller lebensbedrohlichen Situationen unterschätzt - Experten nennen das "unglaublich gefährlich". https://winfuture.de/news,157157.html?utm_source=Mastodon&utm_medium=ManualStatus&utm_campaign=SocialMedia
Show Original Post
TeresaPotenza (@TeresaPotenza@mastodon.uno)
#Giudici e #avvocati che citano #sentenze ...inesistenti? Sì, perché "lo ha segnalato #ChatGPT ".
Succede - speriamo sempre meno...
Ed è stato un piacere enorme parlarne con Marilisa D'Amico, costituzionalista, docente universitaria, fondatrice di Human Hall etc etc.
Se ascoltate la puntata del #podcast scrivetemi che cosa ne pensate!
https://rss.com/podcasts/potenza-artificiale/2560578/
Show Original Post