activitypub

Back Open Paginator
16.08.2025 01:55
kkarhan (@kkarhan@infosec.space)

@jeremy @pluralistic calling #ATproto aka. #BlueSky "federated" is as much as a #lie as calling #Discord instances as "#Servers"...




Show Original Post


16.08.2025 01:17
daltux (@daltux@ayom.media)

Função muito supimpa do #SNAC que só recentemente constatei como é útil: podemos pôr no texto a ligação para uma imagem externa, que ele a transforma em anexo da "atividade" (a publicação no #ActivityPub), sem precisar armazená-la! Pode notar que essa foto do Locutus — Cap. Picard (Patrick Stewart) assimilado pelos Borg — é descarregada diretamente da Wikimedia Commons! :geordi_like:

Não sei se outros sistemas, mesmo os que também já suportam #Markdown, fazem isso! Quem aí pode dizer?




Show Original Post


15.08.2025 23:40
objects (@objects@mitra.social)

Week in Fediverse 2025-08-15

Servers

- Manyfold v0.121.0
- Hubzilla v10.4.3
- NeoDB v0.11.8.3
- Oni: A single user ActivityPub server that supports Client to Server API

Clients

- Tusky v30.0
- Tuba v0.10.1
- tinmop v0.9.9.14142135623730951
- Aria v1.3.6
- Blorp v1.9.11
- NeoDB You: A native Android App for NeoDB

For developers

- APx v0.16.0
- fediverse-pasture-inputs v0.1.16

Articles

- Big Updates Are Coming to Loops
- Is Meta Scraping the Fediverse for AI?
- Bridging identity with account links
- There is One Fediverse. There are a Million Fediverses
- Fediverse Report – #129

-----

#WeekInFediverse #Fediverse #ActivityPub

Previous edition: https://mitra.social/objects/01988be7-7a91-ee71-ece6-1684c60759e8




Show Original Post


15.08.2025 18:34
sraars (@sraars@hippodon.com)

Thinking of spinning up a WriteFreely instance on a VPS I have sitting around. Anyone using it at all for personal blogging or even other writing endeavors?
#WriteFreely #activitypub




Show Original Post


15.08.2025 17:06
p (@p@postygram.com)
For my #fediverse #activitypub projects, please follow @faeempress@tokler.com as this account will be for my travel and dog photos.



Show Original Post


15.08.2025 17:06
marqle (@marqle@mastodonapp.uk)

@lianna

Now you've elaborated, I do seem to remember quite a few people posting about #peertube - and #lemmy to a lesser extent.

I think there may be special issues with the way they use #ActivityPub but I hasten to add, I don't know the ins an outs of it well enough to say for sure.

It's interesting that #friendica works more or less perfectly though, despite being at least as complex as the others you mention.

I wonder if it's because it's far older, so everyone already knows how to allow for its quirks.

It's an interesting topic though - and obviously one I follow :)




Show Original Post


15.08.2025 17:04
notes (@notes@tokler.com)

I'm moving posts regarding my #activitypub projects to Tokler. I want to post travel photos and my dogs on Postygram. So here is where Raels and Tynkle development posts will go. #tiktok #fediverse





Show Original Post


15.08.2025 16:54
marqle (@marqle@mastodonapp.uk)

@lianna

the best way I saw #ActivityPub explained was as being like email protocols.

On the most basic level, text works, but the more complexity you add the more inconsistency you see.

For example, if you attach large files, some email providers will not deliver it. If you use some css some email services won't format it the same way.

And recently - well about a year ago - some yahoo accounts weren't able to receive some exchange emails.

We're all so used to this we don't even think about, but from what I've read it;'s the same issue at work with the #fediverse.

Because servers get so much freedom in how to operate, it breaks things for some users.

The social media we're used to is more homogeneous, but it wasn't always that way.

We used to have these issues with #nntp servers, where for example some servers refused to encapsulate #yenc messages correctly

It's not that #mastodon is the new way; it's just that we've forgotten the old way :)




Show Original Post


15.08.2025 16:38
lianna (@lianna@micro.webgarden.click)

Dumb question that I was always too afraid to ask:

I know how the #Fediverse and its federation works. It's intuitive and familiar to me; I mean, I even host my own instance.

But I never understood how interaction cross-software is supposed to work. In theory, I can use whatever #ActivityPub software I want and still interact with everyone else. But in practice that just... isn't the case, right?

I mean, for text it's quite simple: I write a short post on #Mastodon and people on #GoToSocial or #Misskey or whatever can see and read that same post and interact with it. They can see my profile and it appears on their instance in their style and with their features.

Even outside of microblogging I still get it. A super-long post on #Friendica or #Diaspora appears on my timeline, too. Their profiles might have more fields than I can see here, but that's fine.

But what's up beyond that?

I can see #Pixelfed posts here, converted into image galleries. But what about the other way 'round? If someone on Pixelfed follows my Mastodon account, they can't see any of my non-image posts, right?

What about #PeerTube and such niche software? I guess I could follow a PeerTube account as a microblogger and see their videos and descriptions in my timeline. Video comments are replies.

But the other way 'round? How are they supposed to interact with Friendica or Pixelfed users? PeerTube doesn't even have a "timeline".

Doesn't that feature disparity undermine the whole idea of the #Fediverse or am I missing something?

#AskFedi #FediAdmin




Show Original Post


15.08.2025 16:13
fedizen (@fedizen@mastodon.social)

»Pentagon Funded Experiment Develops Robots that Change by ‘Consuming’ Other Robots« 404media.co/pentagon-funded-ex




Show Original Post


15.08.2025 14:17
mariusor (@mariusor@metalhead.club)

Is anyone aware of a FEP for that?

#ActivityPub #ActivityPubDev #FEP




Show Original Post


15.08.2025 14:16
mariusor (@mariusor@metalhead.club)

I just realized that the default specifications for ActivityPub/ActivityStreams do not have a way to perform an update on an object's ID. (ie, moving it from example.com/1 -> example.com/2)

An Update activity does not allow ID updates because it would lose the reference to the original one. (It can be massaged by using an Origin property, but I don't like that).

Another option would be to use a Move activity (which is defined as moving objects between collections), where the Origin property is the object itself instead of a collection. (I like this behaviour better, as it requires less divergence from the spec)

#ActivityPub #fedidev #ActivityPubDev




Show Original Post


1 ...389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 ...421
UP