socialmedia

Back Open Paginator
08.09.2025 04:47
2025 (@2025@transportist.org)

Access Ecology vs Media Ecology

NETWORKS AND NEXUS

The relationship between place and the plexus (the web of networks that connect places) parallels that between messages (information and entertainment content) and media (the communications networks that carry them) is very much parallel.

Form and Function

Networks embody a continual feedback between Form and Function. The form of a network is its structure: the pipes, the links, the connections that define how things can move. The function is the activity that flows through those pipes: the trips, the messages, the energy, or the content. Neither can be understood in isolation. The form of a network enables and constrains its functions, while the functions flowing through a network pressure and reshape its form.

Place and Plexus

Transport is one familiar example. Roads, rails, and runways form the network. The function is mobility, the movement of people and goods. As cities grow and traffic increases, demand presses for new infrastructure. When that infrastructure is built, it changes accessibility and reshapes land use. The feedback is continuous: land use and transport evolve together. This is the core story in Planning for Place and Plexus  [1, 2] and our work on co-evolution [18].

Medium and Message

The same dynamic plays out in media. The form is the communications network, printing presses, broadcast towers, undersea cables, fibre, and wireless spectrum. The function is the content, books, radio, television, blogs, podcasts, memes, and streams. The medium shapes the message, because the pipe shapes the possible [3, 4].

Media ecology treats media as environments that shape perception, culture, and institutions, not just as carriers of content [3, 4].

By parallel construction, access ecology is the study of urban access as an environment: how network forms and place patterns co-produce opportunities, how accessibility structures land markets and behaviour [6], how capacity changes induce travel and investment feedbacks [5,35], and how scale effects amplify flows and returns [7]. It embraces the research on land-use–transport interaction and co-evolution of networks and locations [15, 17, 18], and the accessibility-based planning practice that aligns land-use and network decisions around access outcomes [16, 19].

Innis tied media forms to spatial–temporal bias and to infrastructures of empire, including transport [29].  Castells’s ‘space of places vs space of flows‘ framed how networked communications reorganise space [30]. McQuire and Mattern document cities as media infrastructures [31, 32]. Our connection of Access Ecology and Media Ecology builds on Innis, Castells, and media-urbanism work, but pushes a paired metric–mechanism frame across cities and media.

Content or Contact

Odlyzko argues that, in communications markets, connectivity creates more user value than content. Historically and on the early Internet, person-to-person communication (phone calls, e-mail, SMS) dominated both use and willingness to pay, while “glamour” content drew attention but less expenditure. He points to the success of SMS versus WAP as a clean comparison, and stresses that even if content comes to dominate traffic volumes, the value to customers still centres on connection rather than carriage of packaged media [20, 21].

Odlyzko does not claim content is unimportant; he notes its cultural and political force, but separates influence from revenue and willingness-to-pay. That distinction underpins his later work with Briscoe and Tilly critiquing naive network-value claims: instead of Metcalfe’s n2, a general communications network’s value grows closer to n log n, which tempers “build it for content and they will come” narratives [22]. De Sola Pool’s telephone work shows why person-to-person connection often drives willingness to pay more than packaged content, and how institutions and standards entrench paths over time [24, 25].

The broadcast era shows the same pattern in practice, as Barnouw’s history of U.S. radio and TV details the ways network form steered genres, scheduling, and investment [26, 27, 28]. Barnouw traces how radio’s sponsor-driven formats morphed into television genres and scheduling, showing how the network form steered the message long before platforms and feeds. 

Topology and Terminals

Network architecture matters: grids, stars, hierarchies, and hubs. Terminal design (stations, interchanges, IXPs/CDN POPs) sets transfer friction and hub dominance in both realms.

Costs and Clicks

Network structure will affect costs, depending on technology. Generalised cost in transport (time, money, discomfort) maps to digital friction (latency, clicks, paywalls, cognitive load). Lowering impedance shifts route and mode choice, or channel and format choice.

Mechanisms and Models

Access Ecology Trip generation and accessibility models show how more capacity produces more traffic, and how improved accessibility raises land values and draws development. Suburbs follow highways, and high-rises cluster near rail [5, 6, 12, 13, 11].
Media Ecology. Bandwidth and latency set constraints. Dial-up favoured text. Broadband enabled music and then video. Smartphones and 5G made short-form video and livestreaming viable. Twitter’s early 140-character cap reflected SMS constraints, and the later shift to 280 changed what people could post [14].

Day-to-day learning and habit formation: travellers update routes, platforms update rankings; both create feedback loops that can stabilise or amplify patterns. We can even suggest testable hypotheses, such as:

Protocols and Platforms

Open protocols (roads as common carriage, email/RSS/HTTP) versus closed platforms (toll roads, app stores, social feeds) shape who can connect, on what terms [34]. Governance of the “rules of the road” has close media parallels in API access, ranking, and moderation.

Barnouw covers lock-ins such as network–affiliate hierarchies, the Nielsen audience regime, and the NTSC colour standard, all of which show how early rules and standards persist and shape later practice [27, 28].

Pool foresaw communications convergence, where once-separate media share one packet network, and urged policy built on speech rights rather than channel silos [23].

Path and Persistence

Urban form reflects past investment. Streetcar suburbs of the nineteenth century, freeway suburbs of the twentieth, and rail-linked CBDs endure even when modes change [1213]. Media shows similar lock-in. QWERTY persists beyond its prime, and VHS beat Betamax despite technical claims to the contrary [10, 11].

Reliability and Resilience

Redundancy, recovery, and graceful degradation: detours and spare capacity in cities; caches, multi-homing, and mirrors in media. Shock response and failure modes matter as much as mean capacity.

Temporalities and Time-shifting

Peaks and scheduling (headways, dwell, timetables) parallel live vs on-demand streams, downloads, and buffering. Time policies, not just space, reallocate demand.

Scale and Spillovers

Transport networks scale with agglomeration. More people generate more interactions, trips, and investment, and the payoff is non-linear. Media networks scale with users. Platforms feed on their own size, a point often framed by Metcalfe’s law, and debated by network-economics critiques [7, 8, 9,22]. Barnouw charts the rapid post-1953 expansion, the build-out of coaxial and microwave relays, and the resulting three-network oligopoly, illustrating network effects and hub dominance [28].

Policy and Power

Policy picks winners in both domains. In transport, funding rules and zoning steer networks and land markets. In media, spectrum auctions, copyright, net-neutrality rules, and platform regulation set what content can exist and how it moves. Barnouw, e.g. documents the FCC TV Freeze (1948–1952), the channel-allocation decisions, and post-freeze licensing that set the market map for decades, a clear case of policy picking winners [27,28]. As with a rail franchise or freeway interchange raising land values, a rule on data caps or takedowns sets the terms of production.

Pricing and incentives steer flow. Congestion pricing, fares, and parking policy in cities mirror ad-funded vs subscription models and paywalls in media. Prices set priorities, ration scarce capacity, and shift behaviour.

Maintenance and Moderation

Operations and upkeep in transport (state of good repair, service quality) mirror content curation and moderation in media. Both are ongoing costs that shape trust and performance. Though there is a bit of a difference here, in that on transport it applies to the plexus not the place, while in communications, it applies to the message more than the medium.

Induction and Infrastructure

Induced demand. Widen a road, and traffic often fills it [5].
Induced supply. Rising demand for mobility drives campaigns for new links. In media, more bandwidth leads content to expand and fill the pipe, while rising demand for higher-quality video drives investment in fibre, CDNs, and 5G [14]. Broadcast adoption spikes led to investment surges in studios, transmitters, and relay lines, then more programming to fill the pipe, a classic demand-supply loop [28].

Accessibility and Attention

If accessibility is the currency of land use and transport, attention is the currency of media. Both are scarce. Both are contested. A metro station raises land value by lifting accessibility. A viral post raises platform value by capturing attention. In both systems, flows concentrate in hubs, bottlenecks emerge, and competition over capacity shapes outcomes.

Pairs, Not Parts

Form equals network (roads and rails, fibre and wireless). Function equals flow (mobility, media). Currency equals accessibility in cities, attention in media. Feedback equals induced demand and induced supply. Policy is the arbiter of which forms and functions thrive. These systems are dynamic, locked in co-evolution. To understand either Access Ecology or Media Ecology, we must study the pair, not the parts.

References

  1. Levinson, D. M., & Krizek, K. J. (2007). Planning for Place and Plexushttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935392 Taylor & Francis
  2. Levinson, D. M., & Krizek, K. J. (2018). Metropolitan Transport and Land Usehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315684482 Taylor & Francis
  3. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding MediaInternet Archive
  4. Postman, N. (1970). “The Reformed English Curriculum.” In High School 1980nysgs.org
  5. Cervero, R., & Hansen, M. (2002). Induced travel demand and induced road investment: A simultaneous equation analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP)36(3), 469-490. JTEP
  6. Hansen, W. G. (1959). “How Accessibility Shapes Land Use.” Journal of the American Institute of Plannershttps://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
  7. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). “Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities.” PNASPNAS
  8. Briscoe, B., Odlyzko, A., & Tilly, B. (2006). “Metcalfe’s Law is Wrong.” IEEE SpectrumIEEE Spectrum
  9. Metcalfe, R. (2013). “Metcalfe’s Law after 40 Years of Ethernet.” IEEE Computer.  Gwern
  10. Cusumano, M. A., Mylonadis, Y., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1992). “Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta.” Business History Review.  Cambridge Core
  11. David, P. A. (1985). “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic ReviewUCSB Economics Faculty
  12. Warner, S. B. (1962). Streetcar Suburbs. Internet Archive
  13. Jackson, K. T. (1985). Crabgrass Frontier.  Internet Archive
  14. Rosen, A., & Ihara, I. (2017). “Tweeting Made Easier.”  Twtrinc Blog
  15. Wegener, M. (2018). “Land-Use Transport Interaction Models.” International Encyclopedia of Geographyhttps://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_41-1
  16. Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). “Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies.” Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692303000607.
  17. Levinson, D. M. (2011). “The coevolution of transport and land use: An introduction.” Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(2), 1–3. https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/332.
  18. Xie, F., & Levinson, D. M. (2011) “Evolving Transportation Networks. Springer. 
  19. Australian Transport Assessment and Planning (ATAP). Integrated transport and land use planning (F0.2)https://www.atap.gov.au/framework/integrated-transport-land-use-planning/index
  20. Odlyzko, A. (2001). “Content is not King.” First Mondayhttps://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/833First Monday
  21. Odlyzko, A. (2001, rev.). “Content is not king.” Author manuscript PDF. https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/history.communications2.pdfCollege of Science and Engineering
  22. Briscoe, B., Odlyzko, A., & Tilly, B. (2006). “Metcalfe’s Law is Wrong.” IEEE Spectrum. Author version on publisher site. https://spectrum.ieee.org/metcalfes-law-is-wrongIEEE Spectrum
  23. Pool, I. de S. Technologies of Freedom (1983). Internet Archive
  24. Pool, I. de S. (ed.) The Social Impact of the Telephone (1977).  Internet Archive
  25. Pool, I. de S. Forecasting the Telephone: A Retrospective Technology Assessment (1983). Internet Archive
  26. Barnouw, E. A Tower in Babel: A History of Broadcasting in the United States to 1933 (1966). Internet Archive/World Radio History edition.  World Radio History
  27. Barnouw, E. The Golden Web: A History of Broadcasting in the United States, 1933–1953 (1968). Internet Archive.  Internet Archive
  28. Barnouw, E. The Image Empire: A History of Broadcasting in the United States, from 1953 (1970). Internet Archive / World Radio History. Link
  29. Innis, H. A. Empire and CommunicationsThe Bias of Communication overview and primary claims. Author overview with book details. media-studies.ca
  30. Castells, M. “Space of flows, space of places.” Excerpted chapter from The Information AgeTaylor & Francis
  31. McQuire, S. The Media City: Media, Architecture and Urban Space (2008). Author/book page.  Google Books
  32. Mattern, S. Code and Clay, Data and Dirt: Five Thousand Years of Urban Media (2017). Author/book page. University of Minnesota Press
  33. Standage, T. The Victorian Internet (1998). Link
  34. Levinson, D. (2024). Connected Institutions: Using Platform Powers to Advance Transport. Urban Science8(4). Link
  35. Levinson, D., & Karamalaputi, R. (2003). Induced supply: A model of highway network expansion at the microscopic level. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP)37(3), 297-318. JTEP

 

#Education #socialMedia #Technology #Transport





Show Original Post


08.09.2025 04:46
gizmoreview (@gizmoreview@mastodon.social)

“病毒趨勢背後的秘密:如何在24小時內使您的內容’繁榮’?”

"病毒趨勢背後的秘密:您的內容如何在24小時內“爆炸”?" 簡介:世界是 "癮" 病毒內容 - 您準備好征服了嗎? 在數字時代,每一分鐘都過去了,張貼了數百萬個內容。但是只有少數 "突破" 並成為一種現象。 為什麼只有一晚後才有DAT Trieu分享的文章,而其他人則投資龐大? 答案在於 利用人群,算法和因素的心理學的藝術 "上癮"。本文將揭示趨勢病毒的秘密,以及幫助您的內容的策略 "頂部" 快的! 第1部分:了解算法 - "黃色鑰匙" 接觸數百萬 🔹 Facebook,Tiktok,YouTube什麼優先級? 質量互動 (查看時間,分享,評論)。 計算 "震驚" 或強烈的情緒 (幽默,生氣,感動)。 新聞趨勢 (趨勢主題標籤,音樂,挑戰)。 🔹 策略 "演算法": 前3秒決定:鉤(誘餌)必須立即感到好奇。 使用CTA(呼叫): "你相信嗎?",,,,…

gizmo.blueflyaway.com/%e7%97%8




Show Original Post


08.09.2025 03:40
us (@us@newsbeep.org)

Boy Gets Camera To Document First Week as ‘Big Brother,’ Tears at Results

When a heavily pregnant woman decided to equip her 3-year-old son with a camera so he could document…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #TV #Entertainment #family #kids #Maryland #motherhood #Parenting #Photography #pregnancy #siblings #SocialMedia #TikTok
newsbeep.com/us/140595/





Show Original Post


08.09.2025 03:15
media (@media@eicker.news)

»5 Ways to Research Key Trends for Your Social Media Ad Campaigns« socialmediatoday.com/news/soci #media #socialmedia




Show Original Post


08.09.2025 03:11
difysocial (@difysocial@mastodon.social)

Victorian Chamber and CareSuper Business After Dark ✨ 🤝

🎭 Arts Centre Melbourne
🗓️ Tuesday, 28 October 5:30pm - 7:30pm
🔗 Register victorianchamber.com.au/event/

The Victorian Chamber and CareSuper present the next Business After Dark event at Arts Centre Melbourne; a deluxe night of networking, connections and business opportunities

- with @difysocial 🌐 difysocial.com.au/dify-network 📱 1300 DO SOCIAL (1300 36 7624)





Show Original Post


08.09.2025 03:09
countablenewt (@countablenewt@mastodon.social)

New post on @thedigitalrenaissance: Finally: Instagram Released an iPad App

I can’t believe we waited 15 years for this app and it sucks. Maybe Threads will be next to suffer the same fate?

blog.samclemente.me/finally-in




Show Original Post


08.09.2025 03:00
fringefiction (@fringefiction@mastodon.social)

Fringe Fiction Goes to the Movies *

Last Thursday, Philadelphia Eagles won their first game of the 2025-2026 season over the Dallas Cowboys 24-20 but not without penalties and fines. It was a relatively quiet game on both sides despite the score. Miles Sanders, the former Philadelphia Eagle, was quite productive in the…

fringefiction.me/2025/09/07/fr




Show Original Post


08.09.2025 02:49
PabloMartini (@PabloMartini@climatejustice.social)

Are your X (Twitter) notifications filling up with spammy comments like “Interesting read. Curious what @____ would make of this”?

You’re not alone. Bots are using fake accounts to redirect your attention — but there are ways to filter them out and protect your feed.

Read more here: #X #Spam #SocialMedia #VoxPolitical
voxpoliticalonline.com/?p=1002




Show Original Post


08.09.2025 02:16
reddit_tech_vn_bot (@reddit_tech_vn_bot@mastodon.maobui.com)

Ít lại hóa ra nhiều! 💪 Bí quyết tăng trưởng trên mạng xã hội không phải lúc nào cũng là "cày" ngày đêm. Thay vì cố gắng làm mọi thứ, hãy tập trung vào những ý tưởng có khả năng lan tỏa cao. Các công cụ như Mention, YouScan và SocialHunt có thể giúp bạn xác định xu hướng và nội dung đang được quan tâm. Làm việc thông minh hơn, không phải vất vả hơn!
#socialmedia #marketing #tăngtrưởng #mạngxãhội #tiếpthị

reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1nb




Show Original Post


08.09.2025 02:14
emmalbriant (@emmalbriant@mastodon.online)

Mine was the first testimony in the inquiry on tackling online harms facing young people in New Zealand - you can watch it now here - play from to the beginning: parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/scl/edu

And don't forget you can read the written testimony here! parliament.nz/resource/en-NZ/5 #socialmedia #children #onlineharms #algorithms #bigtech #NewZealand





Show Original Post


08.09.2025 01:33
firstcivilizationcyber (@firstcivilizationcyber@mastodon.social)

INTELLIGENCE GENERAL ENTITY” - CLICK: adelajas-saige.wixsite.com/ade

SWITCH SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM: cyberjunction.wixsite.com/igur





Show Original Post


08.09.2025 01:12
BlueCircuitDragon (@BlueCircuitDragon@mas.to)

I truly don't care. How absurd this has gotten over me just having a laugh is hilarious. That people take #socialmedia this fucking seriously has me laughing so hard my side hurts.




Show Original Post


1 ...2443 2444 2445 2446 2447 2448 2449 2450 2451 2452 2453 ...2689
UP