medinfo (@medinfo@mastodon.social)
Kritik an #ChatGPT #Health: #Gesundheitsdaten falsch interpretiert. Ein aktueller Erfahrungsbericht der Washington Post wirft ein kritisches Licht auf den neuen Gesundheitsbereich von #OpenAI.
https://www.ifun.de/akritik-an-chatgpt-health-gesundheitsdaten-falsch-interpretiertkritik-an-chatgpt-health-gesundheitsdaten-zu-falschen-schluessen-fuehren-273313/
Show Original Post
fllics (@fllics@mastodon.social)
SoftBank may invest $30 billion more in OpenAI, source says | REUTERS
SoftBank is in talks to invest as much as an additional $30 billion in OpenAI, a person familiar with the matter said, as the Japanese conglomerate doubles down on its bet on the ChatGPT owner. #News #Reuters #Newsfeed #softbank #openai #aritificialintelligence #aiboom #chatgpt Read the story here: 👉 Subscribe: Keep up with the latest news from around the world: Follow Reuters on Facebook: Follow…
https://fllics.com/en/video/softbank-may-invest-30-billion-more-in-openai-source-says-reuters/
Show Original Post
siltaer (@siltaer@piaille.fr)
ChatGPT dépassé, pertes records : OpenAI est-il en train de vaciller ?
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/chatgpt-chatgpt-depasse-pertes-records-openai-il-train-vaciller-130594
OpenAI est le grand pionnier de l’intelligence artificielle générative, et son chatbot ChatGPT a été la référence ces dernières années. Toutefois, la firme se fait rattraper, voire même dépasser, par ses rivaux, et plusieurs spécialistes y voient déjà des signes annonciateurs de la fin.
Show Original Post
numerama (@numerama@news.piaf.im)
Google AI Plus : avec son nouvel abonnement à 8 euros par mois, Gemini veut tuer ChatGPT Go
#IntelligenceArtificielle #Chatgpt #ChatgptGo #Google
Quelques jours après le lancement de l'abonnement ChatGPT Go à 8 euros par mois, Google réplique avec Google AI Plus, une formule équivalente qui donne accès à la meilleure version de Gemini et à 200-->
https://www.numerama.com/tech/2168959-google-ai-plus-avec-son-nouvel-abonnement-a-8-euros-par-mois-gemini-veut-tuer-chatgpt-go.html
Wed, 28 Jan 2026 08:54:17 +0000
Show Original Post
hauschke (@hauschke@mastodon.social)
I see the future of paper mills, and its name is Prism.
This will greatly accelerate the slopification of science.
Show Original Post
gibnnetwork (@gibnnetwork@mastodon.social)
ChatGPT Prism Launches as OpenAI Expands AI Into Scientific Writing
#ChatGPT #ChatGPTPrism #OpenAI #Technology
Show Original Post
starfrosch (@starfrosch@mastodon.social)
#Claude ist im Minimum auf dem Level eines Junior #Linux #Sysadmin s mit #Docker Kenntnissen #AI #KI (#ChatGPT benutzt zu viel toxisches Microdosing)
Show Original Post
talkbitz (@talkbitz@mastodon.social)
When I first started learning about AI tools last year, I was completely overwhelmed. Like, deer-in-headlights overwhelmed...
🔗 https://social.talkbitz.com/ayw2f
Show Original Post
Pepijn (@Pepijn@mastodon.online)
Question about the data used by AI models. Specifically #ChatGPT and the #Google #Gemini offerings.
In 2005 I helped expose a group of Dutch neo-nazis / POS. As some kind of retribution I got targeted online. The only bit close to a "big deal" was a clumsy attempt at doxing using a combo of -then- public photos and embellished facts shared in simple websites.
I got most of it removed quickly, and the remainders in ~2014/5 (thanks GDPR).
SO COLOR ME SURPRISED WHEN ... ->
1/2
Show Original Post
oatmeal (@oatmeal@kolektiva.social)
Quoting unixdigest on how #AI is causing harm that isn’t justified by its utility:
[…] All the Big Tech public AIs, whether it's #Claude, #CoPilot, #ChatGPT, #Gemini, or any of others, make serious mistakes in code, almost all the time. When things just seem to work, it's often because the code is too basic, the AI misses vital validation steps, vital security steps, it sometimes hallucinates code that does nothing in the program, etc. So, the code "works", but the program is really bad. The amateur developer is oblivious to all of this.
[…] The bad that the AI technology is causing is NOT AT ALL outweighed by the usefulness IMHO.
Couldn’t agree more. Amateur developers love AI because they get “working” code quickly but can’t see hidden bugs, security issues, or quality problems due to lack of experience. Worse, their learning is stalled because they rely on AI instead of studying documentation and understanding technology. Which also means they can’t spot or fix bugs. This is a disaster waiting to happen because companies are already blindly integrating AI without realizing future problems. On the other hand, lazy but experienced developers love AI as a time-saver and CAN fix the mistakes AI makes. Artisan programmers don’t like AI because it produces slop code and the time spent fixing it exceeds doing it right from the start.
About the use of the term “hallucinations” with AI, anthropomorphic language like “hallucination,” “thinking,” “learning,” and claiming systems have “perceptions” is part of the AI hype machine that misleads people about what these systems actually are and do.
[…] “It matters what words we use when we talk about these technologies. For instance, in our writing, we don’t use the term ‘hallucination’ to discuss the errors of LLMs, for two reasons. First, if it’s used tongue-in-cheek, it is making light of what can be symptoms of serious mental illness. Second, ‘hallucination’ refers to the experience of perceiving things that aren’t there. But LLMs actually don’t have perceptions, and suggesting that they do is yet more unhelpful anthropomorphization. That means we also avoid assigning thought processes to these systems, or saying that they can ‘think’. Metaphors have power, they structure the frames of discourse, and they can subtly and insidiously encourage certain ways of understanding technology and the social systems it is embedded in.”
Bender, Emily M., and Alex Hanna. The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create a Human-Centered Future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2024.
#theaicon #aihype #aiethics #technofascism #nerdreich #artisanprogramming
Show Original Post
sayzard (@sayzard@mastodon.sayzard.org)
Kit Rada (@kit22211)
작성자는 ChatGPT 앱과 OpenAI가 오늘까지도 사실 확인(fact finding)에서 오류를 보인다고 지적하며, @grok에게는 오류가 전혀 없는지(또는 99.9% 오류 없음인지)를 묻고 OpenAIDevs 계정에 알리고 있다. 즉, 주요 AI 서비스의 정확성 문제를 지적하는 사용자 불만 제기 트윗이다.
https://x.com/kit22211/status/2016347531597513026
#openai #chatgpt #grok #factchecking
Show Original Post
Mathrubhumi_English (@Mathrubhumi_English@mastodon.social)
OpenAI launches Prism, an AI-native workspace for academic research. Streamline drafting, data synthesis, and collaboration with GPT-5.2. Free access! https://english.mathrubhumi.com/technology/openai-prism-ai-academic-research-v5qo0buu?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #openai #chatgpt #prism #technews
Show Original Post