r (@r@fed.brid.gy)
youtu.be/7vJDJYsMlZM?... #skypilot #socialmedia #socialmediachanel
Domingo VI Ordinario
Show Original Post
kongakong (@kongakong@masto.ai)
Tragic 🙁
"Gloucestershire Police said an analysis of Mitchell's social media found that she had been filming Snapchat videos while behind the wheel.
These videos showed her 'lack of care for driving safely', police said, with one showing her veering onto the opposite side of the road towards an oncoming car as friends shouted for her to stop."
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ew3vp8dlzo
#unitedkingdom
#uk
#carcrash
#reckless
#socialmedia
Show Original Post
A7Production (@A7Production@mastodon.social)
🔴 De nouveaux défis se préparent à l'horizon. ✅
https://a7productions.blogspot.com/p/7-radio-100-mix.html
#World #Travel #Voyages #France #Photography #Music #Media
#Live #Podcast #A7Radio #Radio #Streaming #Webradio #Paris #Mix #Dj #Social
#Motivation #Pixelfed #Socialmedia #Fediradio
Show Original Post
ericdsmall (@ericdsmall@mastodon.vtip.me)
The DHS is increasingly demanding tech companies reveal identities behind anti-ICE social media accounts, sending hundreds of confidential subpoenas to Google, Meta, Reddit, and Discord. Unlike warrants, these administrative subpoenas bypass court review, raising civil liberties concerns. The government claims these requests aim to protect ICE officers and investigate threats, but critics warn this erodes online anonymity and free speech. Targeted accounts like “Montco Community Watch” highlight efforts to monitor ICE activity in communities. The price of using corporate social media and what to do about it: https://www.thedailybeast.com/dhs-orders-tech-giants-to-unmask-anti-ice-accounts/ #Privacy #FreeSpeech #DHS #ICE #CivilLiberties #SocialMedia #FreedomOfExpression
Show Original Post
openonline (@openonline@social.thelab.uno)
📰 Fabrizio Corona prepara nuove rivelazioni, l’alert ai fan dopo il ricovero in ospedale: «Domani parlo…»
#️⃣ #CULTURASPETTACOLO #FabrizioCorona #Sanit #Socialmedia #OpenOnline #TheLabSocial #News #Notizie #Italia
🔗 https://www.open.online/2026/02/14/fabrizio-corona-spiegazione-ricovero-ospedale/
Show Original Post
McDonald_69 (@McDonald_69@mastodon.social)
Why are so many organisations leaving X?
Many organisation have recently announced that they will no longer be posting on their X accounts.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxz995vd9ko
Show Original Post
blaue_Fledermaus (@blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io)
I've been forced to go back to LinkedIn this week, and oh boy, the AI insanity makes me want to pull out my hair.
#linkedin #socialmedia #jobhunting #ai
Show Original Post
archives (@archives@neon-blue-demon-wyrm.x10.network)
So, I’m a developer. Maybe at some point I’ll care enough to write something that goes into the technical details. I’ve been following this:
https://oisaur.com/@renchap/116056634129526611
All I can think while reading this is: Well, that’s unfortunate. It pretty much comes down to the fact that the ActivityPub protocol is flawed at the protocol level when it comes to protecting people from harassment. While Bluesky’s app view is choosing to apply its tools selectively to address this, it is more capable of protecting people. Honestly, that really sucks, because that spells the death of this protocol. ActivityPub’s decentralized design doesn’t provide built-in, enforceable protections against harassment. This makes moderation and harassment mitigation difficult in practice. Social media has normalized lying to its users, so am I surprised? No. Here is the issue:
What I noticed was this phrase by Renaud Chaput:
“First step for us is probably staying alive and continuing having a team that is focused on building a better product, which is our focus right now. We are very well aware of this topic (as I keep repeating each time you mention me 😉 ).”
They are saying the quiet part out loud: We are having issues staying relevant.
ActivityPub is built on the ActivityStreams 2.0 vocabulary. Three core components define it: Actor, Object, and Activity. It provides a Client-to-Server (C2S) API that lets an Actor submit Activities to an outbox. It also provides a Server-to-Server (S2S) federation protocol. This protocol delivers those Activities to other servers’ inboxes. Addressing fields such as to, cc, bcc, and audience shape delivery semantics.
Replies are created by setting the inReplyTo property on an Object. Servers may expose a replies Collection. However, that collection is optional and not globally authoritative. The specification describes how Activities are serialized and delivered. It does not introduce a canonical container for conversations. It does not define a required global index or binding enforcement rules for moderation. A Block Activity is defined as a type of Activity. However, remote servers are not obligated to remove or hide content beyond their own policies. Each server maintains its own inboxes, outboxes, collections, and storage model. It interprets incoming Activities according to local implementation choices.
This facilitates interoperability at the transport and vocabulary level. It does not do so at the level of governance. Servers do not have to construct identical conversation graphs from inReplyTo chains. Nothing in the protocol allows an Actor to assert authoritative control over all descendant replies. This is the main problem. Federation operates peer to peer among autonomous servers. Moderation decisions, including defederation, filtering, and suspensions, remain local. The specification does not define a global control layer.
The AT Protocol approaches the problem differently. Users are identified through Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs). They publish signed records stored in repositories. These repositories are usually hosted on a Personal Data Server (PDS). They are append-only and cryptographically verifiable. Records follow schemas defined in Lexicon. Lexicon describes types, fields, and RPC interfaces in machine-readable form. Updates propagate through relays. These relays aggregate repository changes into a network-wide event stream, often called the firehose. Higher-level services, including AppViews, subscribe to this stream. They may also query indexes derived from it. The AT Protocol defines message delivery, identity, storage, and synchronization.
Within the AT Protocol, moderation operates across the same repository data. Labeling and visibility controls are expressed as structured records. Clients or AppViews can apply them deterministically if they choose to consume them. Content exists as signed records keyed by DIDs. It is distributed through relays. Moderation services therefore work against a consistent dataset rather than isolated server copies. Identity portability follows from this structure. Users can move between hosting providers without losing their DID, repository history, or social graph.
ActivityPub standardizes how Activities move between servers and how they are described. It leaves indexing, thread authority, and enforcement to individual implementations. The AT Protocol defines repository structure, identity binding, record schemas, and synchronization across the network. ActivityPub centers on federated message exchange with local policy control. No participant has protocol-level authority over the shape or visibility of a conversation once it federates. The AT Protocol centers on a shared record system with portable identity and network-wide data propagation. Moderation and visibility decisions can attach to the same canonical records seen across the network.
In ActivityPub’s model, moderation is local. If someone replies to you in a harassing way, your server can hide it, block it, or defederate from the offending server. Other servers may still store, display, and propagate those replies according to their own policies. There is no protocol-level mechanism that lets you assert binding control over how replies to your post are indexed or rendered elsewhere. Harassment mitigation is fragmented. Harassment can persist in parallel contexts even after you act against it locally.
In the AT Protocol model, content exists as signed records in repositories keyed to portable identities. It is distributed through a shared data propagation layer. Because of this, moderation services can operate against a consistent dataset. Labels, visibility controls, or account-level actions can attach to the same canonical records that other services consume. While it does not eliminate harassment, it makes it technically possible for moderation decisions to propagate more coherently across applications that choose to honor them.
So the difference for harassment is this: in ActivityPub, protection is inherently piecemeal and server-scoped. In the AT Protocol, protection can be structurally network-aware. Identity, storage, and moderation signals live in the same shared data model.
Basically, the fediverse has no means to keep vulnerable, marginalized people safe. The AT Protocol does, albeit the Bluesky app view chooses not to use it. The point is that it has the potential. The last time I tried to explain all of this, I was harassed by a person who operates multiple servers and accounts on here:
@FediThing @FediTips @FediFollows@social.growyourown.services @FediVideo@social.growyourown.services @FediGarden@social.growyourown.services and @homegrown@social.growyourown.services
The protocol is fundamentally flawed, and they do not know how to fix it. These people are incapable of good-faith conversations, so I am avoiding tagging them or attaching this response.to the thread, because their response is basically to stall, hedge, and gas light.
Show Original Post
notes (@notes@bofh.social)
I'm an American, and I'm telling you to stay the fuck away. Don't come here for the #WorldCup. You will be asked to give up your address book/ #contacts, all of your #phone #numbers and the phone numbers of your relatives, your #SocialMedia accounts (and those of your relatives), and have to give your DNA at the airport before entry.
Seriously, just stay the fuck away. Please. #USpol
---
RE: https://social.woefdram.nl/item/ff804a5b-b5ff-472a-902c-b40fc9ca3d37
Show Original Post
kairos (@kairos@mast.lat)
Recordar es fácil
para el que tiene memoria.
Olvidar es difícil
para quien tiene corazón.
Porque la memoria guarda datos,
pero el corazón guarda momentos.
La memoria recuerda fechas, nombres, lugares;
el corazón recuerda miradas, promesas, silencios
y todo aquello que nos tocó el alma.
Hay recuerdos que no se borran
aunque pase el tiempo,
aunque cambien las personas,
aunque la vida nos lleve por otros caminos.
No porque no queramos olvidar,
sino porque lo vivido fue verdadero.
El corazón no olvida lo que amó,
lo que dolió,
lo que dejó huella.
Aprende a callarlo, a acomodarlo,
a vivir con ello sin que sangre,
pero olvidarlo… eso es otra cosa.
Olvidar no siempre es soltar,
a veces es traicionarse.
Por eso quien tiene corazón
no borra, transforma:
convierte el recuerdo en aprendizaje,
la ausencia en fortaleza,
y el dolor en silencio digno.
Recordar no es volver atrás,
es reconocer lo que nos hizo ser quienes somos hoy.
Y olvidar… olvidar no es cerrar los ojos,
es aceptar que hay cosas
que se quedan a vivir en el alma
para siempre. #skypiloto #socialmedia #socialmediachanel
Show Original Post
kairos (@kairos@mast.lat)
Somos reemplazables en lo que hacemos,
sí… en los cargos, en las rutinas, en los lugares
que un día ocupamos y que mañana otro ocupará.
El mundo sigue, las sillas cambian de nombre,
los horarios se llenan de otras manos,
y aquello que parecía imprescindible
aprende a caminar sin nosotros.
Pero no somos reemplazables en lo que somos.
Nadie puede imitar tu manera de sentir,
tu forma de amar cuando amas de verdad,
la manera en que cargas tus silencios
o cómo sonríes incluso cuando duele.
Nadie puede repetir tus batallas internas,
ni entender del todo las noches
en las que te levantaste roto
y aun así seguiste adelante.
Tu esencia no se copia.
Tu alma no se sustituye.
Tu historia no se borra ni se vuelve a escribir igual.
Eres el resultado de todo lo que viviste,
de lo que perdiste, de lo que resististe,
de lo que aprendiste a soltar
y de lo que aún guardas en el corazón.
Eres tus cicatrices,
tus sueños que no murieron,
tu manera única de mirar el mundo
aunque el mundo no siempre te mire a ti.
Podrán reemplazarte en un trabajo,
en un lugar, en una función…
pero nadie ocupará jamás
el espacio exacto que dejaste en un alma,
el recuerdo que sembraste en una vida,
la huella silenciosa que dejaste
sin darte cuenta.
Porque hacer es pasajero.
Ser es eterno. #skypiloto #socialmedia #socialmediachanel
Show Original Post
sayzard (@sayzard@mastodon.sayzard.org)
Radu Oncescu (@oncescuradu)
Meta가 사용자 인기 게시물의 'Post insights' 섹션에서 Manus AI를 콘텐츠 전략 도구로 홍보하기 시작했다는 보고. 플랫폼 내에서 Manus AI 연동/추천을 통해 크리에이터의 콘텐츠 기획·분석 워크플로에 영향을 줄 가능성이 있음.
https://x.com/oncescuradu/status/2022668543444082953
#meta #manusai #contentstrategy #socialmedia
Show Original Post